|
The following are the most common types of accident (but
there are others - if in doubt, contact us for advice):
Accidents with other vehicles
- You get hit by (or fall off trying to avoid) another
vehicle
- a car pulls out from a side road
- a car turns right across your
path
- a car hits you from behind (or while overtaking)
- a car overtakes
you and then turns left
these are just some examples
of the hundreds of accidents we have dealt with. We
have to
show
that the other driver was negligent in law - not
difficult in most cases. You may even have a claim if you
think
you are partly to blame - see the page on contributory
negligence.
Potholes or defective road surfaces
In order to make a successful claim for your accident, there
are certain things we have to establish, but whichever applies
we will need as much information as possible about the surrounding
circumstances - how long the defect had been there; if anyone
else had reported it; whether you already knew it was there
etc.
 |
If
you have hit something sticking up from, or a hole in,
the surface of the road: |
Firstly, we must show that the defect is bad enough to be
considered a clear hazard to people using the area.
The guideline marker for defects on the pavement is that
the trip must be 1 inch either, sticking up, or deep, into
the pavement. There is no equivalent guideline for defects
in the road, but the inch depth is a useful guide.
That part of the claim is usually the least difficult to
deal with, because it will be fairly clear in most cases
whether
or not the defect is a danger to road users. However,
it is important that you get some photographs of the defect
BEFORE it is repaired. Once the council (or other
body responsible for the area) becomes aware that there
has
been an accident, they will normally be very quick to carry
out repairs! If you are able try to obtain photographs,
preferably
using some sort of measure against which to compare the size
- e.g. a rigid ruler, or some other identifiable object.
The second thing we must show is that either: the local authority
with responsibility for the road either knew of the defect
and did not repair it; or that they did not carry out regular
inspections of the road. This should usually be done at a
minimum of 6 monthly intervals, but what is considered reasonable
will vary according to how major the road is.
Finding out whether the road has been inspected regularly
enough is the difficult part of a claim such as this. Local
authorities rarely co-operate in these claims, and often the
only way to find out whether they have inspected is to issue
proceedings through the court. We can then force them to show
us their inspection records.
 |
If
your accident has been caused by something left/fallen/spilled
on the highway |
These claims may be more difficult to prove. If your accident
has been caused by something spilled or left by someone unknown,
unless the council were made aware of the spillage before
your accident (and did nothing about it within a reasonable
time), then you will have difficulty in claiming against
the highway authority.
You should be able to claim if we can identify who was
responsible for the spill, then you will be able to make
a claim against
them: the most common example of this type of claim is
where work has been carried out and the contractors have
failed
to clean up properly, or have left their materials on the
road, causing a hazard.
However, if you are unable to identify who caused the spillage
then it is still possible that there may be a claim through
the Motor
Insurers' Bureau provided we can prove that the
spillage was caused by a motor vehicle which would have
been required to have
insurance for use on the road (most vehicles).
The most important thing that we need to advise you of
with these claims is that they can take some time to settle
- on average 12 to 18 months - due to most local authorities'
or contractor's delays. However, you have our assurance
that any delays will be due to factors outside our control
and that we will deal with your claim as quickly as possible.
 |
If
your accident has been caused by badly carried out repairs |
Provided work has been carried out on the road by the highway
authority or someone contracted or authorised by them (i.e.
someone unknown hasn't just come along and done something
without any authority), these types of claims may be easier
to prove. The important thing is that you get photographs
of the poor surface before it is repaired, so that we have
evidence of its condition. The fact of the poor repair will
usually be evidence of negligence and we will then usually
only have to show that the defect is sufficiently poor as
to be a hazard to road users.
 |
Grids
inserted the wrong way around |
Accidents can be caused where drain covers with slots are
inserted with the slots
running parallel with the direction of the traffic instead
of perpendicular to it. Again,
you should seek specialist advice, as the general rules which
allow the highway
authority to escape liability may not apply here.
Accidents caused by a faulty piece of equipment
This is known as `product liability' and can be quite a
complicated area of law. There
are three areas which are likely to overlap:
- a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (for
which the time limit to
claim is only 2 years in most cases, shorter than the
normal time limits for
personal injury)
- a claim for breach of contract
- a claim against the manufacturer for negligence
in manufacture
Because of the potential complexity of these
claims, it is important that you seek
specialist advice as early as possible. Not all personal
injury solicitors will have
experience of these types of claim.
|